| (07.26) | Lady in the Water |
| (05.21) | Da Vinci Code, The |
| (05.06) | United 93 |
| (02.05) | King Kong |
| (01.29) | Syriana |
| (01.24) | Walk the Line |
| (01.05) | Chronicles of Narnia, The: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe |
| (01.02) | Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire |
| (12.30) | Jarhead |
| (12.27) | Wallace & Gromit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit |
| (12.05) | randy: Polar Express, The |
| (12.02) | Geoff: Polar Express, The |
| (07.27) | Jen: Lady in the Water |
| (07.27) | Justin: Lady in the Water |
| (07.12) | Sarah: Da Vinci Code, The |
| (05.25) | Chris: Da Vinci Code, The |
| (05.25) | Acceler8: Da Vinci Code, The |
| (05.21) | Mr Plow: Da Vinci Code, The |
| (05.11) | Sarah: United 93 |
| (05.11) | Bread: United 93 |
Films don't have to have complex plots or characters to be interesting. There's definitely something to be said for "simple" film-making, and Speilberg's E.T. is an excellent example of this. The plot is far from complex, and the characters are pretty straightforward. I'm finding it a little difficult to say a whole lot about E.T., which I guess is because it's so simple.
Still, it is a good movie, and I suppose that has a lot to do with the strong script and acting, as well as the special effects that went into creating a very believable character out of what is essentially a big lump of brown foam-rubber.
I would've liked to have seen more about the mental-connection-thingy that develops between E.T. and Elliot, as that seems to lead up to the emotional high-point of the film, but that's a minor complaint.
E.T. has held up very well since its release twenty years ago, and will probably be just as good for many decades to come.
Hey, that's the gretaest! So with ll this brain power AWHFY?
QfS61v kuvdxphhnnkm
QfS61v kuvdxphhnnkm
raqjQQ tweogzynswoa