GEOFF'S MOVIE REVIEWS - New Reviews

(07.26) Lady in the Water 4.0 / 5
(05.21) Da Vinci Code, The 2.5 / 5
(05.06) United 93 5.0 / 5
(02.05) King Kong 3.5 / 5
(01.29) Syriana 4.0 / 5
(01.24) Walk the Line 4.0 / 5
(01.05) Chronicles of Narnia, The: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe 3.0 / 5
(01.02) Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 3.5 / 5
(12.30) Jarhead 3.5 / 5
(12.27) Wallace & Gromit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit 3.5 / 5

New Comments

(12.05) randy: Polar Express, The
(12.02) Geoff: Polar Express, The
(07.27) Jen: Lady in the Water
(07.27) Justin: Lady in the Water
(07.12) Sarah: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Chris: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Acceler8: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.21) Mr Plow: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.11) Sarah: United 93
(05.11) Bread: United 93

Movie Reviews


Frida

4.0 / 5
Posted by Geoff on Sunday, January 5, 2003 at 01:20AM | Post a Comment

Initial Review (Sunday, January 5, 2003):

The best part was when the projector jammed and the film melted...

Second Review (Sunday, February 23, 2003):

Well, now that I've actually seen the whole movie, I guess it would be a good idea to write a proper review!

Frida is a biopic about about Mexico's most famous artist, Frida Kahlo (excellently portrayed by Selma Hayek). After being seriously injured in an automobile accident, and then wrapped into an imobilizing body cast, Frida has little else to do except paint on her cast, and later on an easle given to her by her father. Maybe because of the circumstances surrounding her first paintings, it seems to me that a lot of her subsequent works show almost surrealistic depictions of tragedy, pain, and suffering (mostly her own).

The film shows that Frida's life was full of some exceptionally happy moments, but also some horribly tragic ones (including the death of her child, the 'unfaithfulness' of her husband -- leading to their divorce -- and the assisination of her revolutionist friend, Leon Trotsky). The acting and the screenplay were so strong that, by the end, I felt that I'd really gotten to know and understand her. At its most basic but important level, the film certainly succeeds.

The screenplay also pays a lot of attention to Frida's husband, Diego Revera (played by Alfred Molina -- another excellent permormance). I guess that's because Frida did spend the majority of her life with him, and he was at least partially responsible for most the major events in her life. I walked away from the film feeling as though I knew almost as much about Diego as I did about Frida.

One last thing I want to comment on (I won't bother saying much about the directing and the cinematography, except that they're both excellent), is the many 'fantasy' sequences that are placed throughout the film. I won't bother explaining them, as that would be too difficult, but they're essentially small scenes that popped up now and then to illustrate in a very stylized and 'fantastical' manner the feelings and emotions Frida experiences.

Actually, I will say that a number of these sequences involve a still-frame of one of Frida's paintings suddenly 'coming to life' and blending into the 'reality' of the rest of the film. I love it when filmmakers take advantage of the capabilities of thier medium and do stuff like that.

If there's one problem I had with Frida it would be that it didn't focus enough on her art. Of course, Kahlo's art is a reflection of her life experiences (and the movie offers plenty on that subject), but the surrealistic character of many of her pieces made me want to know more about those pieces themselves, and why Kahlo portrayed certain things in certain ways.

But that's a minor complaint. Frida is a very good movie.

Comments: 4

#1 - Posted by randy on January 5, 2003 2:21 AM:

damnit!!! now i really wish i'd gone

that happened to aaron williamson when he saw amelie...i really want to experience this!!!

#2 - Posted by Geoff on January 12, 2003 2:21 PM:

When Aaron saw Amelie, do you know if they managed to fix the projector/film so he could actually see the rest of it?
I admit it was definitely kind've cool to see that happen, though it really sucked that we didn't get to see the last 10-15 minutes of it (I certainly would've preferred if the breakdown thing happened closer to the beginning of the movie!)
The guy operating the projector that night told us, after it happened, that he would try to fix it, though it would take at least ten minutes, and he might not even be able to fix it at all. Turned out that, after ten minutes, he realized it was gonna take a good hour-and-a-half or so to get it done, so we just got free passes for another film.
I guess I'll have to rent Frida when it comes out on video to actually see all of it (it was shaping up to be a really decent movie... the "1" rating is not really what I would be giving it had I actually seen the whole thing).

#3 - Posted by randy on January 19, 2003 3:13 AM:

aaron got passes as well, they didn't fix it that night

#4 - Posted by Geoff on February 23, 2003 9:15 PM:

... just wanted to throw a comment in here so peoeple can see that I've updated the review after seeing this again :-)
I saw it last week at Harris Road Cinema's "Wednesday Night Art Film" series, and I'm still amazed at how many people are showing up to these... the show was sold out!

Post a Comment

Remember info?