GEOFF'S MOVIE REVIEWS - New Reviews

(07.26) Lady in the Water 4.0 / 5
(05.21) Da Vinci Code, The 2.5 / 5
(05.06) United 93 5.0 / 5
(02.05) King Kong 3.5 / 5
(01.29) Syriana 4.0 / 5
(01.24) Walk the Line 4.0 / 5
(01.05) Chronicles of Narnia, The: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe 3.0 / 5
(01.02) Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 3.5 / 5
(12.30) Jarhead 3.5 / 5
(12.27) Wallace & Gromit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit 3.5 / 5

New Comments

(12.05) randy: Polar Express, The
(12.02) Geoff: Polar Express, The
(07.27) Jen: Lady in the Water
(07.27) Justin: Lady in the Water
(07.12) Sarah: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Chris: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Acceler8: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.21) Mr Plow: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.11) Sarah: United 93
(05.11) Bread: United 93

Movie Reviews


Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events

2.5 / 5
Posted by Geoff on Saturday, January 22, 2005 at 09:40PM | Post a Comment

A Series of Unfortunate Events is a combined film adaptation of the first three Lemony Snicket books, and perhaps as such, it felt to me just like it sounds: a series of somewhat unconnected and disjointed events.

The first Unfortunate Event occurs immediately prior to the start of the film, when the three Baudelaire children -- Violet, Klaus, and Sunny -- return home one day to find that their parents have died in a massive fire at their house. We're introduced to these three sad siblings and their unfortunate circumstances by a faceless narrator, Lemony Snicket (Jude Law), who observes that each of them sports a peculiar 'ability' (that will no-doubt come in handy throughout the film). Violet is a talented inventor, Klaus has the uncanny knack for remember whatever he's read, and the infant Sunny... well, she bites things.

The subsequent Events involve the Baudelaire children meeting and attempting to live with various long-lost relatives -- the first of which is the nefarious Count Olaf (Jim Carrey), a distant uncle of theirs whose interests lie not with the children, but with the fortune he might appropriate should the children 'accidentally' perish before they become of age. The children soon get wise to his motives, and are off to live with their next long-lost Uncle Monty (Billy Connolly), but when a disguised Olaf shows up again to screw them over, they move again to yet another relative, Aunt Josephine (Meryl Streep). It's not long afterwards that the Count reappears.

Each of the various relatives are fairly interesting, with their own assorted humorous quirks, personalities, and histories. However, except in the loose sense that they're related to the Baudelaires, and that the last two (Monty and Josephine) are being harassed by the first (Olaf), there's no real connection among them. I would've likely preferred a film that focused on only one of the Baudelaire relations (more like the books, apparently), instead of the three that are in this one. Maybe the writers tried that, only to find that each relation couldn't carry enough material for a whole film, and instead just threw three of them into one movie to fill up space.

The film has a fair number of funny moments, but I wasn't too impressed with Jim Carrey's role (or roles, if you count the various disguised characters he plays). He was really hamming it up and going a little overboard, and it was a bit distracting watching Jim Carrey play Jim Carrey. Also in the 'Not-Really-That-Funny' category was the running joke of translating Sunny's toddler-speak "goo-goo's" and "ga-ga's" into witty remarks via subtitles.

Due to the popularity of the Lemony Snicket books, I imagine this franchise will be around for a while. I just hope that the next instalment is less of an unconnected Series of Unfortunate Events, and is more of a Cohesive Unfortunate Story (doesn't have quite the same ring to it though, doesn't it?).

Comments: 11

#1 - Posted by Sarah on January 26, 2005 10:24 AM:

Geoff! I am shocked! You didn't even mention the greatness of the Newfie sea captain Carrey played! Such a uniquely Canadian stamp on the movie. I though the movie was well done for cramming three books into one, although I do agree that I wish it could have been a full course of each relative instead of just an appetizer. I am now inspired to read the books.

As for Carrey's over the top performance, it IS a children's movie and that sort of human cartoon really captures their attention.

#2 - Posted by Geoff on January 27, 2005 8:33 AM:

Yeah, there were a few laughs, including the Newfie captain :-)
But I did think that there were far more times when the movie tried to be funny, but just wasn't.
I forgot to mention another positive though, and that's that I thought the whole movie *looked* really great.

#3 - Posted by Bread on February 2, 2005 12:30 PM:

Although incredibly dark I found this movie intriguing and whimsical. I understand people get down on Carrey for his reoccuring comedic roles but if there was ever a movie tailored for his style this would be it. Yes, distinctly Jim Carrey in all the characters he played but keep in mind that it was supposed to be the same person in disguise anyways. I found it incredibly refreshing and very tasteful and fitting for Carrey's comedic style.

Considering you use a 6 star system, I would have easily gave this at least a 5

#4 - Posted by Gaelic_Earl on February 12, 2005 4:27 PM:

I thought Geoff used a 5 star system...

Beyond that, haven't seen it, can't say much about the film...

#5 - Posted by jennifer on September 17, 2005 11:50 PM:

The books are way better than the movie. I have to say I was looking forward to it and was very disappointed. The movie jumped around out of order and was very disjointed, confusing for those who have and have not read the books. As much as I dislike Jim Carey as an actor, he is the only person that could pull off the character of Count Olaf. If you are intrigued by the story don't wait for the next movie, read the books. As they were meant for kids it only takes a few hours to read one. There are 10 out already and an 11th on the way.

#6 - Posted by B-Rad on November 8, 2005 6:20 PM:

Wow, Im suprised you rated this movie so low.
I havent read the books, I thought the movie was pretty damn good. Enough so that I bought it. Most of all I absolutely loved the art style. Jim Carry was pretty cool as all the characters too. Im suprised its a kids book though, it is really dark Kind of freaky for kids isnt it?
Id give this one 4 stars

#7 - Posted by Lele on February 2, 2012 8:13 AM:

That's way more cevler than I was expecting. Thanks!

#8 - Posted by cyorejwab on February 3, 2012 1:15 AM:

47jel9 jeitswuweuva

#9 - Posted by cyorejwab on February 3, 2012 1:15 AM:

47jel9 jeitswuweuva

#10 - Posted by cyorejwab on February 3, 2012 1:15 AM:

47jel9 jeitswuweuva

#11 - Posted by iiouyuih on February 4, 2012 2:37 AM:

n26St4 lcqcdkrmbipi

Post a Comment

Remember info?