GEOFF'S MOVIE REVIEWS - New Reviews

(07.26) Lady in the Water 4.0 / 5
(05.21) Da Vinci Code, The 2.5 / 5
(05.06) United 93 5.0 / 5
(02.05) King Kong 3.5 / 5
(01.29) Syriana 4.0 / 5
(01.24) Walk the Line 4.0 / 5
(01.05) Chronicles of Narnia, The: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe 3.0 / 5
(01.02) Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 3.5 / 5
(12.30) Jarhead 3.5 / 5
(12.27) Wallace & Gromit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit 3.5 / 5

New Comments

(12.05) randy: Polar Express, The
(12.02) Geoff: Polar Express, The
(07.27) Jen: Lady in the Water
(07.27) Justin: Lady in the Water
(07.12) Sarah: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Chris: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Acceler8: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.21) Mr Plow: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.11) Sarah: United 93
(05.11) Bread: United 93

Movie Reviews


Transporter, The

1.5 / 5
Posted by Geoff on Thursday, April 24, 2003 at 04:55PM | Post a Comment

The Transporter started off quite decently: we're introduced to Frank Martin (played by a cool English martial-arts guy named Jason Statham). Frank is a freelance "transporter", which means he'll transport anything, wherever you need it to go, no matter what the package is. This means he's also something of a freelance get-away driver, and the promising opening sequence follows him along on one of his jobs, which almost goes bad when the people who have hired him fail to precisely obey the terms of his contract.

See, now that's an interesting set-up -- and I'm sure an interesting movie could be made involving a freelance get-away driver. But unfortunately, this basic premise is where the film's good ideas end. What happens next involves another transport job, but this time, the package is a duffle-bag with a live (and thoroughly annoying) Asian woman inside it. Frank, however, has these little "rules" of his, that he always follows while on a job. But on this job, he ends up breaking Rule Number 3, "Never Look in the Package" (I know it's rule number three because his stupid rules are repeated over and over again as if they're actually important or something). So anyway, now that he knows what that particular 'package' is, he gets into some hot water with the poeple who hired him to transport it, and the rest of the film turns into a pretty lame action-fest involving some stupid plot about some kind of gang smuggling immigrant slaves into the country (it was really unfortunate how the film degenerated from "interesting freelance transporter" to "rescuing smuggled immigrant slaves").

Okay, now, what I want to talk about next might sound like some kind overly-educated, university-student, lame social-criticism. Let me say, however, that this is the first time that something like this has ever really bothered me in a movie. The problem? This is one hell of a sexist movie. First of all, there's only one woman in the entire movie (the annoying Asian girl). Second, she's an annoying Asian girl. Third, she is the most stereotypically weak and "I'm-only-in-this-movie-to-look-good-and-be-rescued-by-the-hero" character I've ever seen. Seriously, she does nothing in this movie that involves any kind of strength, and halfway through she offers herself up sexually to Frank for saving her in an earlier action sequence. Sheesh, haven't we progressed passed this kind of thing in the last thirty or fourty years?

Okay, the rant's over. On the plus side (as small a side as it is), a couple of the action sequences were mildly entertaining. But then again, one of the film's main action sequences was completely and utterly stupid: Frank takes on a gang of bad-guys in a warehouse in which the floor has been covered in slippery oil. He notices that everyone (himself included) has started to fall over after every step, so what does he do? He knocks the pedals off a mountain bike, slips his feet into the pedals, and is able to kick the crap out of everyone with his newly-acquired magical grip. Laaaaaame...

Oh, and one more thing: The Transporter might possibly have the worst soundtrack I've ever heard in a movie. Ever.

It's a bad movie. Don't bother with it.

Comments: 11

#1 - Posted by Thorn on April 30, 2003 5:28 PM:

Here's my view of the movie.

First 30 or 45 minutes or so, awesome flick. Nice action scenes. After that, it sucked big time. The characters were weak, the story was weak, and the ending was pathetic (can you say a Fox Production?) I agree with Geoff with pretty much everything he said. If it had stuck with what was originally said, it would have been cool. But what REALLY bugged me is when he transported the second package, which turned out to be a bomb. How stupid can you get. It's in the standard "bomb-suitcase" and the whole setup screams "BOMB BOMB BOMB" Anyway, I was disgusted with the whole second part. Incredibly unbelieveable.

#2 - Posted by Geoff on May 3, 2003 10:02 PM:

Hehe, the more comments I read from you, Pete, the more I think you have some pretty decent tastes in movies! :-)

#3 - Posted by Thorn on May 4, 2003 1:06 AM:

Finally, some credibility! But don't worry, it probably won't last too long. I have a knack for liking bad movies.

#4 - Posted by Jennica on February 2, 2012 5:04 PM:

Just what the doctor ordered, thantiky you!

#5 - Posted by Jennica on February 2, 2012 5:04 PM:

Just what the doctor ordered, thantiky you!

#6 - Posted by Jennica on February 2, 2012 5:05 PM:

Just what the doctor ordered, thantiky you!

#7 - Posted by Memoti on February 5, 2012 9:48 PM:

You are ctonemming using your Twitter account. (  ) You are ctonemming using your Facebook account. (  ) Connecting to %s Notify me of follow-up comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.jQuery( function( $ ) {$( '#hiab-script-1' ).parents( 'form' ).append( '' );} );PRISM international

#8 - Posted by uioqqxs on February 7, 2012 1:37 AM:

5BkhU1 keaitatumjvy

#9 - Posted by fpebimnw on February 10, 2012 8:43 AM:

fGn7YR iexjlppvfkcg

#10 - Posted by fpebimnw on February 10, 2012 8:44 AM:

fGn7YR iexjlppvfkcg

#11 - Posted by fpebimnw on February 10, 2012 8:44 AM:

fGn7YR iexjlppvfkcg

Post a Comment

Remember info?