GEOFF'S MOVIE REVIEWS - New Reviews

(07.26) Lady in the Water 4.0 / 5
(05.21) Da Vinci Code, The 2.5 / 5
(05.06) United 93 5.0 / 5
(02.05) King Kong 3.5 / 5
(01.29) Syriana 4.0 / 5
(01.24) Walk the Line 4.0 / 5
(01.05) Chronicles of Narnia, The: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe 3.0 / 5
(01.02) Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 3.5 / 5
(12.30) Jarhead 3.5 / 5
(12.27) Wallace & Gromit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit 3.5 / 5

New Comments

(12.05) randy: Polar Express, The
(12.02) Geoff: Polar Express, The
(07.27) Jen: Lady in the Water
(07.27) Justin: Lady in the Water
(07.12) Sarah: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Chris: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.25) Acceler8: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.21) Mr Plow: Da Vinci Code, The
(05.11) Sarah: United 93
(05.11) Bread: United 93

Movie Reviews


What the #$*! Do We Know!?

1.5 / 5
Posted by Geoff on Saturday, May 21, 2005 at 05:12PM | Post a Comment

How often does this happen: so I'm watching this pretty bad movie called What the #$*! Do We Know!? (yes, the "#$*!" is part of it's official title; any other arrangement of nonsensical punctuation marks is incorrect) and I'm thinking, "Hmm, this movie is pretty bad, but it's talking about some very interesting things. I wish I was reading a textbook about those very interesting things right now, rather than watching this pretty bad movie".

That doesn't happen very often at all. What the #$*! Do We Know!? is a documentary, of sorts, about quantum physics. Kind of. Here's the gist of what I think the talking-heads in the film were talking about: Mankind used to be thoroughly spiritual, believing that our existence and our environment was created and controlled by some all-powerful being or force. The "modern" world, however, has moved away from that, with its focus on science, reason, cause-and-effect, etc. But science has been extraordinarily helpful to us, no doubt, as through its practices we've come to understand things that were once thought completely beyond our grasp (the atomic makeup of matter, for instance).

But where do atoms come from, and why do they behave the way they do? Is it possible that there is some even more pervasive fabric to our existence, even more "foundational" than atomic physics? The people interviewed in What the #$*! Do We Know!? believe so, and apparently there is some very real quantum science out there that might actually back them up. Perhaps, as seems to be the case put forward in this film, our super-advanced science may be on the verge directing us towards a new form of spirituality -- not in the form of any established religion that we're familiar with, but more of an understanding and appreciation of how something like our very thoughts can actually have an affect on the material world.

The film explains that the "material world", as we understand it, might actually be quite misleading (this is based on an old philosophical debate: because I am "trapped" within my own mind and experiences, so-to-speak, how do I know that anything outside of me is actually there, and is not just something "constructed" by my brain and interpreted as 'experience'?). Science now continues this argument by saying that because the brain operates on pulses of electricity, there really is no actual 'connection' between any physical world and our minds -- it's all just 'interpreted' by those mysterious and fleeting electrical pulses.

Considering that, the film seems to argue that one day, perhaps we will learn how to "free our minds" and control the traffic in our own personal electrical grids, thereby shedding entirely new light on what 'matter' actually is and how we interact with it.

It's pretty heady stuff, and I'm about 70% sure I only understood about 30% of what the film was trying to say. I found it all quite fascinating, though, especially the potential for a shift towards a new kind of science-based spirituality.

Too bad the movie itself sort of stunk. For some reason it was decided that there should be a special effects-laden "story" intertwined among the talking heads. It was some really awful thing about a depressed photographer tripping into some kind of Alice in Wonderland experience that only loosely connected with what the talking heads were talking about, and it was all done with sub-par computer animation.

And those talking heads were a questionable bunch, too. Some of them were apparently very legitimate scientists and scholars, while others have been revealed to be followers of the "Ramtha School of Enlightenment", a cult-ish group not too far-removed from Scientologists. In fact, one of the main talking-heads is apparently the god Ramtha himself, "channelled" (yes, it says that in the credits) by a middle-aged woman named J.Z. Knight (who is, coincidentally or not, the founder of the Ramtha School of Enlightenment).

Despite feeling that a lot of the 'facts' posited by the people in the film are probably nothing more than New Age hooey, I still found myself quite interested in a lot of what was said. But honestly, I would've preferred to read it out of a textbook than hear it in this pretty bad movie.

Comments: 16

#1 - Posted by travis on May 23, 2005 9:01 AM:

man you make it sound like a sweet movie, i want to see it when i get home.

#2 - Posted by Bread on May 23, 2005 6:12 PM:

J.Z. Knight has been on Coast to Coast before. A lot of interesting notions presented in this movie, but Im sure Sarah will agree with you that this was a terrible movie. I have yet to see it myself.

#3 - Posted by Geoff on May 25, 2005 8:35 AM:

I just realized that this is probably the longest movie review I've written...

#4 - Posted by voider on May 27, 2005 10:42 AM:

uhmm.. so i'm (again) too lazy to read the entire review, but i'm in total agreement with the first.. uhmm.. few lines i managed to read. very interesting topic, very badly presented.
has anyone seen/read anything that would go a wee bit more indepth (as in explain) the connection betwixt quantum physix and this notion of spirituality the movie's trying to put forth?

#5 - Posted by Geoff on May 28, 2005 10:07 AM:

Voider: I tried to explain that in the rest of my review :-)

#6 - Posted by Sarah on May 30, 2005 12:02 PM:

I saw this in theatres! Aidan dragged me to it and I sat wanting to rip out my hair the entire bleeping movie! I have a hard time taking spiritual advice from a woman who claims to channel a 30000 year old Cro-Magnon warrior mystic.

The part that I found funny was wating the credits roll, and showing all the "specialists" in the subject who had bored me to tears, and what they were really "specialists" in. A radiologist? C'mon now! You read x-rays! How the hell are you supposed to be able to twll me about quantum physics? Did you you watch Quantum Leap? GOSH!

Here is the review I posted on Cinema Clock:
The absolute WORST movie I have seen in a very long time. The only redeeming quality of this propaganda driven Quantum-Leap-meets-Hackers was the multicoloured little Flubber representations of our emotions. I wanted to pull my hair out, and firmly believe my evening would have been better spent gouging out my eyes with a dull, rusty spoon. I have seen better acting in porn videos, and the fact that the producers obviously received corporate sponsorship from Nike and FedEx really irked me.

I want those two hours of my life back!

#7 - Posted by Geoff on June 1, 2005 8:59 AM:

Yeah, the movie sucked :-)
But did find any of the stuff they were talking about interesting?

#8 - Posted by SuperCoolMonkeyNinja on June 1, 2005 1:50 PM:

I've actually taken a few quantum physics courses...unfortunately I haven't seen the movie...BUT a lot of my buddies in physics that have seen the movie say its a crappy movie and its a buncha crap....

They told me that in the movie that whenver something couldnt be explained, the people in the movie basically said "Well through quantum physics we can say this and that"....and my friends kept asking themselve....WHAT part of quantum physics?


TOODLES!

#9 - Posted by Sarah on June 7, 2005 8:39 AM:

I actually didn't find anything interesting in movie at all. The entire "the world is only this way becuase you THINK it is this way" pisses me right off. Quantum Mecahanics seems to advocate for controlling your environment through your own thought, but then it presents teh idea that you are doing it wrong. ARG! Seriously, the topic frustrates me so much that I have rejected anything to do with any aspect of that mumbo jumbo, new age hooey.

#10 - Posted by SuperCoolMonkeyNinja on June 10, 2005 8:34 PM:

Hey Sarah...quantum mechanics doesnt have anything to do with controlling ur environment thought your own thought haha..at not least the shit I studied...sounds like this movie is mumbo jumbo...

Real quantum isnt hehe...


TOODLES:)

#11 - Posted by Sherlyn on February 2, 2012 5:29 AM:

I feel satisfied after redanig that one.

#12 - Posted by hlrupz on February 3, 2012 12:23 AM:

bmF1bl bjuxeegztnpj

#13 - Posted by hlrupz on February 3, 2012 12:24 AM:

bmF1bl bjuxeegztnpj

#14 - Posted by hlrupz on February 3, 2012 12:24 AM:

bmF1bl bjuxeegztnpj

#15 - Posted by hlrupz on February 3, 2012 12:28 AM:

bmF1bl bjuxeegztnpj

#16 - Posted by fwnjipo on February 4, 2012 2:09 AM:

xK9fDu ikwprwuzmogp

Post a Comment

Remember info?